Today's Pokemon Card Review is of Natu from the Roaring Skies Pokemon Card Set. This is the first of two Natu cards I'll be reviewing from this set. Natu is a basic, psychic type Pokemon card with an hp of 50. It has a x2 weakness to psychic type Pokemon, no resistance type, and a one colorless energy card retreat cost. This Natu card does not have an Ancient Trait or an Ability and it only has one move. The only move that this card has is called Peck, for one colorless energy card this move does 10 damage.
Pokemon Card Strategy:
So as far as strategy goes, since Natu is a basic Pokemon card with a stage 1 evolution in Xatu, which I'll be reviewing in two days, you'll more than likely want to use this card with that Pokemon. However, since I haven't reviewed that card yet and I haven't even reviewed the second Natu card from this set yet, I'll just act as though I plan on using this card without its evolution and I do not know which Natu card is better. So, on its own, I would not recommend using this card in a deck. My main reason for saying this is because Natu is just too limited in what it can do, since it only has one move and the one move it does have can only do 10 damage total, plus add in the fact it has a below average HP and there are several reasons why you shouldn't use this card in a deck. If you plan on using Xatu or just really want to use this card in your deck, only use one, and get it into the active Pokemon spot as soon as possible so that you can attack quickly and won't get knocked out in one turn.
Pokemon Card Rating:
I would give this card a 2 out of 5 rating. So in my opinion, on its own, without considering Xatu, this is a below average Basic Pokemon card. Like I stated in the strategy section of this post, this card is too limited in what it can do, can't do much damage, and has too low of an HP for me to recommend using. Overall, it could be worse, that is why I am giving it a 2 out of 5 rating instead of a 1, hopefully tomorrow's Natu card is better.
Tomorrow's Pokemon Card:
So thanks for reading today's Pokemon card review of Natu from the Roaring Skies set, stay tuned for tomorrow's card review of the second Natu card, which is from this same set. Make sure to check below for the Free Pokemon TCG Online Codes!
Free Pokemon TCG Online Code Cards:
Today's Quiz for a Pokemon TCG Online Code Card --
True or False? Natu is the first Pokemon I've reviewed from the Roaring Skies that isn't an ultra rare and has two different cards.
Please respond by including your YouTube username and link to your YouTube channel. If the question is quite tough, the first correct comment will win, otherwise I'll use a random number generator to choose a winner.
So as far as strategy goes, since Natu is a basic Pokemon card with a stage 1 evolution in Xatu, which I'll be reviewing in two days, you'll more than likely want to use this card with that Pokemon. However, since I haven't reviewed that card yet and I haven't even reviewed the second Natu card from this set yet, I'll just act as though I plan on using this card without its evolution and I do not know which Natu card is better. So, on its own, I would not recommend using this card in a deck. My main reason for saying this is because Natu is just too limited in what it can do, since it only has one move and the one move it does have can only do 10 damage total, plus add in the fact it has a below average HP and there are several reasons why you shouldn't use this card in a deck. If you plan on using Xatu or just really want to use this card in your deck, only use one, and get it into the active Pokemon spot as soon as possible so that you can attack quickly and won't get knocked out in one turn.
Pokemon Card Rating:
I would give this card a 2 out of 5 rating. So in my opinion, on its own, without considering Xatu, this is a below average Basic Pokemon card. Like I stated in the strategy section of this post, this card is too limited in what it can do, can't do much damage, and has too low of an HP for me to recommend using. Overall, it could be worse, that is why I am giving it a 2 out of 5 rating instead of a 1, hopefully tomorrow's Natu card is better.
Tomorrow's Pokemon Card:
So thanks for reading today's Pokemon card review of Natu from the Roaring Skies set, stay tuned for tomorrow's card review of the second Natu card, which is from this same set. Make sure to check below for the Free Pokemon TCG Online Codes!
Free Pokemon TCG Online Code Cards:
Today's Quiz for a Pokemon TCG Online Code Card --
True or False? Natu is the first Pokemon I've reviewed from the Roaring Skies that isn't an ultra rare and has two different cards.
Please respond by including your YouTube username and link to your YouTube channel. If the question is quite tough, the first correct comment will win, otherwise I'll use a random number generator to choose a winner.
False
ReplyDeleteYT: Daimond Slime
False. Dustox is the first Pokemon you has reviewed from the Roaring Skies set that isn't an ultra rare and has two different cards, Articuno is the second Pokemon while Natu is the third Pokemon.
ReplyDeletecabalw
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnLY5kCyPH6tBOPfSjiVgsg
False. Natu is not the first Pokemon you've reviewed from the Roaring Skies expansion that isn't an Ultra Rare and has two different cards; rather, it is the third.
ReplyDeleteKai Tung Ng
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc_wX6pMW7wFZFmb9E3XmOw
ReplyDeleteIt is false.
Jamesontse: https://www.youtube.com/user/jamesontse
It is false
ReplyDeletelynne v
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2nT4mDeBIFHcN6bs8H6mRA
False, is not
ReplyDeleteChasista
https://www.youtube.com/user/Chasista
False. Natu is not the first.
ReplyDeleteThe Pokemon Cards Collector
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIABBCybvc7rp1sVvdPi_vg
False
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/user/GusEdAndrade
That is clase. It is either the second por the third, I can't remember https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCDQ8uJJx_zSUq_H6a2nP55g
ReplyDeleteFalse Natu was not the first non-ultra rare 2 carded pokemon you ever reviewed it was Bidoof
ReplyDeleteCongrats to lynne v for winning!
ReplyDelete